![Man browsing a beverages display labeled 'Frozen Treats' in a store while a woman in a striped sweater walks by on the right (overhead view).","Shop interior: man at a drinks display on the left and a woman in a striped sweater passing on the right.","Bird's-eye view of a store aisle showing a man near a beverage cooler and a woman in a striped cardigan entering the frame.","Retail scene with a man at a drinks display and a woman in a striped striped sweater walking past on the right."]} } }? 0 0? The format must be exact. Ensure valid JSON. Remove extra. Let's fix. Need one array of strings. Provide proper JSON with type object containing altTexts. No stray characters. Also ensure no duplicate text. Remove typo](https://inlandempirenewsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/cover-image-3511.jpeg)
Dodge County Sues Woman After Probe Says ICE Detention Story Was a Hoax, Drawing Jussie Smollett Comparison
Dodge County Sheriff Dale Schmidt filed a federal lawsuit alleging Sundas “Sunny” Naqvi fabricated claims she was detained by ICE and held in Dodge County Jail for about 40 hours, during a shared social media post that prompted a weeks-long probe.
Key takeaways
- Federal lawsuit: Sheriff Dale Schmidt accuses Sundas “Sunny” Naqvi of fabricating a 40-hour ICE detention, including alleged time at Dodge County Jail. (Fox News)
- Investigators found no records: Records, video and witnesses do not place Naqvi in Dodge County custody, and DHS told reporters her claims were false. (Fox News)
- Contradicting evidence: CBP entries, hotel folios, WhatsApp messages and phone data were cited as inconsistent with Naqvi’s account. (Fox News)
- Public amplification: Social media and some public officials compared the case to the Jussie Smollett episode, raising political and social tensions. (Background on Jussie Smollett case)
Dodge County’s investigation and findings
Sheriff Dale Schmidt said his office opened a weeks-long probe after Naqvi’s account circulated widely on social media and in local reports. Investigators collected records from multiple federal and local agencies and concluded the detention allegations “did not occur.”
“We set out to present fact versus fiction,” Sheriff Schmidt told reporters, saying the office found no booking, detention or release records that place Naqvi in Dodge County custody.
The complaint contends there is no record of Naqvi being booked, detained or released in Dodge County. The sheriff’s office shared findings with federal partners and stated the probe remains active. (Fox News)
Chronology and physical evidence that contradict Naqvi’s account
Investigators assembled a verified timeline and physical records they say directly conflict with Naqvi’s story:
- CBP inspection records: U.S. Customs and Border Protection logs show Naqvi entered secondary inspection at Chicago O’Hare at about 10:46 a.m. on March 5 and was released at about 11:42 a.m.; records indicate she was not detained or transferred after leaving the airport. (Source: Fox News)
- Hotel folios: Records show Naqvi checked into a Hampton Inn & Suites in Rosemont, Illinois, at 1:17 p.m. on March 5; folios document room charges and purchases through March 8, placing her at the hotel during the period she later claimed to be in custody. (Source: Fox News)
- WhatsApp messages: Messages from March 5–8 show active texting about food, work and daily activities; investigators highlighted a message referencing “spa services” and said no such spa exists at the cited facilities. (Source: Fox News)
- Phone location and timing: Publicly posted phone location data did not align with the verified timeline; investigators described some timing as not physically possible. (Source: Fox News)
Public amplification, political figures and social media
The lawsuit details public statements by Cook County Commissioner Kevin Morrison, who publicly amplified claims that Naqvi and others were transported across state lines by immigration agents; the complaint disputes Morrison’s account and alleges reputational harm to the sheriff’s office.
Social media users and accounts also compared the case to the 2019 Jussie Smollett episode, using that event as shorthand for an alleged staged report. Such comparisons increased public attention and political pressure during the early stages of the matter. (Background on Jussie Smollett case; Fox News)
DHS response and prior complaints
The Department of Homeland Security reviewed the matter and told reporters Naqvi’s claims were false, according to the sheriff’s office. The complaint also references prior law enforcement probes involving Naqvi, including an allegation described by investigators as a prior false sexual assault report; those prior matters informed the depth of records review. (Fox News)
Legal action and what the lawsuit alleges
Sheriff Schmidt filed the federal complaint seeking to correct the public record and seek relief for reputational damage to the sheriff’s office. The suit alleges false statements and public claims by Naqvi and others that the sheriff’s office says were untrue, and it seeks accountability for those who spread or amplified the allegations.
Investigators shared findings with the FBI and Illinois State Police and said the probe is ongoing. Sheriff Schmidt acknowledged criminal charges could be difficult, but stressed public officials must correct misleading claims that stir alarm.
Implications for the Inland Empire
Economic impact
False claims can impose indirect costs on local law enforcement and government agencies through diverted resources, extended probes and potential legal action. That burden can translate into taxpayer costs and reduced capacity for community services.
Political consequences
Allegations tied to immigration can quickly become politicized. Local officials may face pressure to respond before facts are verified, elevating the risk of premature statements and reputational fallout.
Social effects
Unverified claims about detentions can inflame tensions and erode trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement. Community groups should prioritize calm, factual communication to limit harm from misinformation.
Cultural relevance
Comparisons to the Jussie Smollett case reflect how national narratives shape local coverage and public perception, often creating skepticism that can complicate responses to genuine incidents.
Practical applications for residents
- Verify claims via official channels: sheriff’s offices, ICE, CBP and DHS statements before sharing.
- Look for corroborating records such as booking logs, agency notifications or travel/hotel folios.
- For worried family members, consult DHS, CBP resources and consular services for official guidance.
How local officials can respond
Officials can adopt rapid, verified public-update channels, designate community liaisons familiar with immigration procedures, and clarify what records can be released promptly to balance transparency with legal constraints.
What to watch next
The sheriff’s office said findings were shared with the FBI and Illinois State Police and the investigation remains open. Watch for any federal action, further statements from local officials, and how social media narratives evolve. The handling of evidence and public communications will shape trust going forward. (Fox News)
